What is the second step in the threat-hunting process after forming a hypothesis?

In the threat-hunting process, after forming a hypothesis, the second step involves triggering or activating the search for the threat based on that hypothesis. This step typically involves defining the specific indicators of compromise or patterns to look for, which serves to direct the investigation effectively.

Triggering represents the shift from theoretical formulation to applied scrutiny where the hypothesis will be tested in practice. This means gathering relevant data, logs, and context to identify potentially malicious activities aligned with the established hypothesis. It is a critical phase that helps focus the efforts of the threat hunters on particular areas, maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness of subsequent investigations.

The focus on initiating a targeted search after formulating a hypothesis reinforces the structured approach to threat hunting, emphasizing the need for clear direction in the investigative process.