Which incident recovery testing method creates a mock disaster to identify procedural reactions?

The method that creates a mock disaster to identify procedural reactions is known as procedure testing. This approach focuses on simulating an incident or disaster scenario, allowing teams to evaluate their response capabilities in real-time. During this type of testing, organizations can observe how well their predefined procedures work when faced with a crisis, ensuring that all personnel understand their roles and responsibilities, and can effectively execute the recovery plan.

Procedure testing is critical because it provides an opportunity to identify gaps in planning, training, or resources that could hinder an effective response during an actual incident. By mimicking a real-life disaster scenario, organizations can conduct a thorough assessment of their incident management strategies and can make informed adjustments to improve readiness and responsiveness.

The other testing methods serve different purposes. For example, parallel testing allows systems to run simultaneously during recovery efforts to ensure they function correctly, but it does not specifically focus on simulating a disaster. Software recovery testing concentrates on the functionality of software applications in recovery scenarios. Full interruption testing involves completely halting operations to validate the recovery process, which can be disruptive and may not specifically assess procedural responses compared to the more focused nature of procedure testing.